JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 3, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Ciro Antonio Rojas Agudelo Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Peticiones Respecto A Las Tutelas Sobre La Flota Mercante Grancolombiana. Rechazo.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se rechazó por improcedente la solicitud elevada por los ciudadanos de la referencia, toda vez que la Sala Segunda de Revisión, con ponencia del suscrito Magistrado, profirió la Sentencia T-413/00, en la cual se pronunció respecto de las peticiones contenidas en los expedientes T-277493, T-300129 y T-301204, agotando en consecuencia, la competencia funcional de esta Corporación.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. Rechazar por improcedente, la solicitud elevada por los ciudadanos Ciro Antonio Rojas Agudelo, Gustavo Cárdenas Cárdenas y Eduardo Chicangana López, a que se refiere la parte motiva de esta provincia.
  2. Segundo. Para los fines pertinentes, remítase a Secretaría junto con esta providencia, el memorial a que ella se refiere.
  3. Notifíquese,
  4. ALFREDO BELTRAN SIERRA
  5. Magistrado
  6. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA DE MONCALEANO
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.